Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tea Faber vs Ipek Oz Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Faber vs Oz analysis and find out who is favored!
Tea Faber vs Ipek Oz Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Faber 1 - 0 Oz
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Faber has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Oz has won 47.32%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Faber, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Oz has won 53.49%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 39.56% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Faber has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Oz has saved 52.65% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Faber has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Oz winning 53.52% (W/L 38/ 33) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Faber has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 37% (W/L 68/ 116), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Oz has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 196/ 137), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Faber winning 1 times and Oz being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Faber winning 2 and Oz winning 0. The last match between Faber and Oz was at the Telavi, 26-07-2018, Second, Clay with Tea Faber getting the victory 6-3 1-0 ret..
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:2:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Faber and Oz have played a deciding set 0 times, with Faber winning 0 times and Oz 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Faber winning 0, and Oz 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Faber has played against opponents with an average rank of while Oz has played against players with an average rank of 287.63.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Faber has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Oz has won 46% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Faber has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Oz has converted 51.53% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Ret.
Rank
High
34
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
192
Rank
163
High
24
Age
Plays
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
36% (84-152)
Career Total W/L
55% (248-200)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
55% (18-15)
$0
Career Prize Money
$42,295
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Tea Faber vs Ipek Oz For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Faber VS Oz
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Tea Faber | Ipek Oz |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 7 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:2:0 | 1:2:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 83% (33/40) | 76% (26/34) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 58% (19/33) | 58% (15/26) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 71% (5/7) | 13% (1/8) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 14% (1/7) |
| Return Points W% | 53% (18/34) | 40% (16/40) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 1-0 ret. |
Stats 
Tea Faber
Player
Ipek Oz
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve %
76%
(
26 of
34)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
40%
(
16 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
42
Total Points Won
32
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tea Faber | Ipek Oz |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 55% (18/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 53% (40/35) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (339/335) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 57% (12/9) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (6/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.14 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 45 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.15 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 48 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:36:54 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 279.21 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 68% (1404/2057) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 58% (809/1404) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 47% (309/653) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 52% (118/229) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 44% (910/2053) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (16/12) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 55% (17/31) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 83% (18/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 17% (18/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 20% (15/3) |
Tea Faber Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Tamara Curovic
Player
Tea Faber
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
4
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
32%
(
8 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
50%
(
28 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
39 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nonna Kurginyan
Player
Tea Faber
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tea Faber
Player
Deniz Paykoc
64%
(
65 of
101)
1st Serve %
58%
(
70 of
121)
-
Aces
-
13
Double Faults
20
51%
(
33 of
65)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
46%
(
11 of
24)
Break Points Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
53%
(
54 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
70 of
121)
117
Total Points Won
105
|
5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tea Faber
Player
Ipek Oz
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve %
76%
(
26 of
34)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
40%
(
16 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
42
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Csilla Argyelan
Player
Tea Faber
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 5-7 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Viktoria Morvayova
Player
Tea Faber
40%
(
19 of
48)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tea Faber
Player
Claudia Williams
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
0
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriela Horackova
Player
Tea Faber
85%
(
44 of
52)
1st Serve %
80%
(
44 of
55)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
42%
(
22 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vitalia Stamat
Player
Tea Faber
82%
(
41 of
50)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
20 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Ipek Oz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Petra Marcinko
Player
Ipek Oz
55%
(
41 of
75)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
84)
1
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
4
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
84)
90
Total Points Won
69
|
4-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tamara Zidansek
Player
Ipek Oz
62%
(
49 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
48%
(
38 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ipek Oz
Player
Yuliia Starodubtseva
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Varvara Lepchenko
Player
Ipek Oz
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve %
67%
(
24 of
36)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
46
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ipek Oz
Player
Aurora Zantedeschi
71%
(
55 of
77)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
83)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
83)
89
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Noma Akugue Noha
Player
Ipek Oz
67%
(
61 of
91)
1st Serve %
62%
(
55 of
89)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
8 of
34)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
46%
(
42 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
49 of
89)
98
Total Points Won
82
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Maja Chwalinska
Player
Ipek Oz
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve %
76%
(
39 of
51)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
14 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ipek Oz
Player
Marina Stakusic
65%
(
61 of
94)
1st Serve %
49%
(
46 of
94)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
11
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
36 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
94)
99
Total Points Won
89
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ipek Oz
Player
Dalila Spiteri
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
65%
(
52 of
80)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
80)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ipek Oz
Player
Denisa Hindova
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
73%
(
32 of
44)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
15 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
54
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Faber Vs Oz Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Faber are available here and Oz photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
